On 04/24/2017 12:15 PM, Milan Crha wrote: > On Mon, 2017-04-24 at 08:18 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: >> If we went this route, I'd love to see us attempt to solve this >> generically for all packages if at all possible. > Hi, > right, having this done transparently for the packagers would be ideal. > You only need to decide from which build/architecture you'll compose > that noarch package. Evolution package used to remove unused translated > strings in the past, during the build. > > My main issue with libreoffice langpacks divided by country was that > even I chose my mother language during installation of Fedora, that > particular langpack wasn't installed, thus libreoffice was not > localized to my mother language, though other parts, like GNOME Shell, > were. This is few Fedora's back, on a machine which I keep updating, > instead of installing from scratch, thus it's possible the behaviour > changed meanwhile. > > I mean, maybe it doesn't make always sense to divide langpacks by > country. These days, I think we divide langpacks (at least at the distro/glibc level) by language rather than country. I have `langpacks-en` on my system, for example.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
