On Fri, 28 Jan 2005, Michael Schwendt wrote:
If i understand the argument that people are making... is that doing it this way... is a burden on 3rd party packagers who have to try to predict when and if Core is going to introduce a libname[Version] for previous versions.
Whenever that happens - when a Core package is renamed like this - the 3rd party packagers need to update their spec files to make them buildrequire libname[Version]-devel instead.
I thought the proposal included that each package include Provides: libname = %version or was that also determined to be problematic?
-- Rex
