Re: Static libraries in Fedora distribution (Was: Re: [Help Wanted] PPC64LE build for thrift)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 15/03/17 19:26 +0000, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote:
On 15 March 2017 at 18:53, Jonathan Wakely <jwakely@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

There are people who use the static libraries, for their own reasons,
and don't expect support when they do so.


I can only repeat that such people should consider linking own binaries
against uClibc as this implementation is not affected by issue with hidden
loading NSS DSOs which probably make such binaries useless on moving around
against latest fedora/RH7 and RH5.

If you don't move the binaries around you don't have a problem.

You're still assuming you know everybody's use cases.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux