On Thu, 2005-01-27 at 14:44 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On Thu, 2005-01-27 at 08:16 -0500, Jeff Johnson wrote: > > Thomas Vander Stichele wrote: > > > > > >c) nothing more was ever offered as negative feedback on mach than "it > > >uses apt" (a fact that is easily changeable, obviously); > > > > > > > Well clearly, having mach rely on a package that is not included in any Red > > Hat product, > RH has the ability to change this at any time. not for the ABE, that has to work for all past releases which are set in stone.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
