Dne 21.2.2017 v 10:10 Vít Ondruch napsal(a): > > Dne 21.2.2017 v 01:31 Ralf Corsepius napsal(a): >> On 02/21/2017 01:09 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: >>> On Mon, 20 Feb 2017 18:24:21 -0500 >>> Neal Gompa <ngompa13@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>>> On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 5:20 PM, Kevin Kofler >>>> <kevin.kofler@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>> Dennis Gilmore wrote: >>>>>> I do not get what you mean by your statement, it is extremely vague >>>>>> with no detail. can you please expand on it in the context of the >>>>>> change? and the changes it will bring to the entire workflow of >>>>>> rawhide? >>>>> Rawhide is just nowhere near working, half the packages have broken >>>>> dependencies due to not building with the latest GCC. >>> Thats a bit over dramatic don't you think? >> No. I fully agree with Kevin K. >> >> Feb 15 rawhide is 100% dysfunctional. >> >>> 968 currently on the FTBFS list, and even there many of those don't >>> have broken deps because the previous build still works. >> Many of the packages you are referring to probably are parts of dep >> chains, which gradually get fixed or have been missed during the >> official "mass-rebuild". >> >> What you are missing: Due to you keeping the package having been >> rebuilt since Feb 15 behind closed doors, NOBODY outside RH can have >> tested them and is able to go after run-time bugs these package >> introduce. > Come on. Outside or inside RH, we are on the same boat. There are > problems which needs to be resolved. I don't understand why you paint it > as some conspiracy. > Just as an example this might be one of the issues I am referring to: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/O7VMZTVUZ6CFUIE3N7TFPRGEPVLFA744/ This prevented Ceph to land for a few days, but once this is polished out, it will increase quality of Fedora. Vít _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
