Re: Spec files maintained in external source control: *please* mention this in the spec file

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 09:44:50AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Hi folks! So I got bitten again today by the situation where the
> primary contact for a given package considers the 'canonical' source
> for the spec file to be some external SCM, and finds it a problem when
> someone (e.g. a provenpackager like me...) changes the package directly
> in dist-git.

https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/613
It's seems to be going nowhere.

> This is at least 50% my fault for not trying to check in before
> changing the package
It'd help if there was a standard way to mark such things.

Zbyszek
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux