On Wed, 2017-02-08 at 09:55 -0500, Daniel J Walsh wrote: > What is going on with this Change Request? Any reason it has not been > acted on at this point? We are putting changes into our packages > assuming that this will be allowed. Given that it is in category "ChangeAcceptedF26", just go ahead and push changes ;) Once it's done, change status of tracking bug (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_b ug.cgi?id=1419514) to MODIFIED. > > > On 01/06/2017 05:08 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 9:29 PM, Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/DockerOverlay2 > > > > Thanks! Note, that you will need to send it for wrangler. > > > > > > On 01/06/2017 02:27 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > > > > > > Shouldn't this be submitted as a change? > > > > > > This would bring much more visibility to users of Fedora and even outside. > > > > > > -Igor Gnatenko > > > > > > On Jan 6, 2017 8:13 PM, "Daniel J Walsh" <dwalsh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Upstream docker is moving to overlay2 by default for its storage. We > > > > plan on following suit. Their are some performance advantages of > > > > overlay2 over devicemapper in memory sharing, which we would like to > > > > take advantage of. We now have SELinux support for Overlay file > > > > systems, so the security should be just as good. > > > > > > > > Note: Overlay is not a Posix Compliant file system, so their could be > > > > problems with your containers running on overlay, so > > > > we want to make sure it is fairly easy to switch back to devicemapper. > > > > > > > > Devicemapper out of the box, on Fedora Workstation, currently defaults > > > > to loopback devices for storage, which has a performance penalty, but > > > > this was the only way we were able to get docker to work right away. > > > > Switching to overlay2 will cause the storage to be shared with / and > > > > will eliminate this performance overhead. This is the way we will ship > > > > Fedora Workstation. > > > > > > > > On Fedora atomic host and Fedora server we have been storing > > > > devicemapper storage on a separate partition. We plan on doing the same > > > > thing with overlay2. This means separate device will be mounted on > > > > /var/lib/docker. This will make it easier for someone to switch back to > > > > devicemapper, if overlay2 has problems. > > > > > > > > Upgraded systems will not be effected. > > > > > > > > If you want to switch from one storage to another take a look at the > > > > `atomic storage` commands. > > > > > > > > We will write up release notes to cover this change. Along with a blog > > > > explaining the commands to switch back and forth. > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > > > > > > > > > -- -Igor Gnatenko
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx