Tom Hughes wrote: > I believe it's referring to the use of /usr/bin/env as mentioned here: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Script_Interpreters_(draft) Note that this is a draft guideline that was voted down: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2009-08-19/fedora-meeting.2009-08-19-16.01.log.html#l-38 It got only -1 votes, not a single +1. So this is NOT an enforced guideline and it is IMHO a bug in rpmlint that it complains about it. > Although I think that draft guideline is outdated and the auto requires > logic does now handle it - although /usr/lib/rpm/script.req has a TODO > comment to fix it there does also seem to be code to handle it. The code handles only the case where what comes after /usr/bin/env is an absolute path, which defeats the point of using /usr/bin/env to begin with. Mageia has a fix that makes it work right: http://svnweb.mageia.org/packages/cauldron/rpm/current/SOURCES/script-env.diff?view=markup Kevin Kofler _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
