Re: Diagreement with pkgconfig removal

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 2017-01-14 at 09:51 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> And being afraid of
> switching to a different and fully compatible implementation of
> pkg-config just because it's not the implementation we've used for
> over a decade is contrary to those values.

But...you just said yourself it's not "fully compatible":

"Admittedly, it is less
tolerant of badly written .pc files, but those should be fixed,
anyway."

To me, 'fully compatible' means 'we can switch tomorrow and nothing
will stop building'. It doesn't mean 'compatible with the letter of the
specification'.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux