On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 6:11 PM, Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Saleem Abdulrasool wrote: >> First, we accepted the /usr-merge (for simplicity and since most Linux >> distributions were doing so) -- not doing so would require two parallel >> trees, but would not prohibit the same approach. The next thing was to >> introduce a "namespace" within the filesystem layout. The root became >> `/usr/<target>`. > > So this is the "everything is a sysroot" approach also suggested elsewhere > in this thread. > >> The differences from FHS are pretty small > > This is not true. Your directory layout is completely incompatible with the > FHS. Every single directory is not where it is supposed to be according to > the FHS. > The sysroot approach could still work in an "FHS-compatible" way by symlinking everything back. FHS permits symlinks to represent a traditional tree in non-traditional structures. -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
