On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 10:21:56 -0500, seth vidal wrote: > > > Is there a good reason it shouldn't be used to mark packages as obsoleting > > others? > > If so, what is it? > > For right now? mostly b/c it's just obsoleting an old version - not a > change of package name. > > we shouldn't use obsoletes to do what a normal version update should do. We don't. This is still about libfoo obsoletes libfoo10 isn't it?
