Quality control can be a thank-less procedure but a very important one that can mean many things to different user groups ie developers or just a regular users - each group has was it priorities are important to them. In a community driven environment it is important to get the mix correct and too ensure that the product remains stable as possible, that all contributors are heading to a common good as what a packager may see as important may or may not be important to the end users. It is ensuring that processes are in place to allow people to contribute easily to any part of the project and ensure that they feel their contribution is worthwhile and respected, and ensuring that the politics are kept to a minimum. Car-clubs are the same and the best one do it well, community based software development may learn from people that have seen things go off the rails and affect community projects to their detriment or destruction. I have been a long time user of fedora products and respect the people that have contributed over the years, but their are signs that some things could be done better but will always depend of resources being available and someone to do it. This needs fostering in any community project IMO to do well. Keep the politics out of the way. Regards Timothy Ward On Thu, 2016-12-22 at 06:56 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 11:08:21AM -0000, Iiro Laiho wrote: > > Yes, I should have been more clear about my intentions. I admit I > > was > > frustrated when I wrote the message. Please do not interpret other > > people's writings in the most hostile possible way. > > Thanks. This too is in the code of conduct. :) > > > _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
