On Tuesday, December 20, 2016 12:11:32 PM CET Matthew Miller wrote: > First, I very frequently hear this: "Fedora should have an LTS — or be > a rolling release." These two things are very far apart in actual > implication, but they have one big thing in common, and when pressed, > it usually comes down to: "Upgrades are painful and scary." We have > been working really hard on making upgrades fast and seamless, so we > need to deliver that message to users (and of course work to make > further improvements). Indeed, I don't remember when I had troubles with N->N+1 major fedora upgrade last time (though I always do distro-sync) on _my workstation_. Upgrades on production servers (services built on top of Fedora) is probably what scares users (with N->N+1 you can always expect a lot of library API changes). But maybe this is the thing which might be solved by modularity; one version of "module" version to span multiple Fedora major versions... Pavel _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
