Re: Status of microcode updates

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Dec 10, 2016 at 2:23 AM, Florian Weimer <fweimer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 12/09/2016 11:16 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 11:10 AM, Florian Weimer <fweimer@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> We would like to enable hardware-assisted lock optimizations in glibc on
>>> multiple architectures.  In general, this feature works only on
>>> production
>>> hardware with current firmware, and not on pre-production machines some
>>> vendors provide for architecture bringup.
>>
>>
>> Have you got an overview of the required instructions/generations of
>> CPU architecture needed for each different architecture by chance?
>
>
> I'm afraid not.  Even the information on ark.intel.com is not accurate
> because it lists TSX support at launch time and does not take into account
> subsequent firmware updates which disable TSX.  Based on ark.intel.com,
> Broadwell and Skylake Xeons seem to support TSX, and Haswell-EX Xeons as
> well, but some other Haswell Xeons do not.
>
> In /proc/cpuinfo, the Intel feature appears as “rtm” (even though the
> marketing name is TSX).
>
> I don't know where the POWER8 support status appears.  It could well be the
> case that all POWER8 CPUs support the form lock elision of that glibc
> supports (optionally).
>
>> From there it might be  easier to give details of where all the build
>> HW is at. In the case of build VMs (x86/aarch64/Power64) does this
>> need to be emulated by qemu/kvm or is it passed through from the host
>> CPU?
>
>
> TSX does not need hypervisor support AFAIK.  We are trying to get
> clarification from KVM folks which CPUID values can be influenced by the
> hypervisor.  We are concerned that the hypervisor makes a CPU with broken
> TSX look like one with working TSX (so that Debian-style software
> blacklisting of TSX fails).

KVM should arguably take care of this itself: mask off TSX in CPUID on
problematic CPUs.  Actually obtaining the list of problematic CPUs may
be difficult.  But maybe it's easy -- Intel often documents errata
fairly well.

--Andy
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux