Re: GSequencer upstream wants to package for fedora

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi all

For your information

http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=16809691
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/jkraehemann/gsequencer/

Bests,
Joël

On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 10:15 PM, Joël Krähemann <jkraehemann@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Michael
>
> I'm not sure of what packaging mistakes you are talking.
> I just updated the spec file and removed the requires field.
>
> But yes, I'd like to give it for review now.
>
> Bests,
> Joël
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 10:04 PM, Michael Schwendt <mschwendt@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Fri, 9 Dec 2016 21:57:07 +0100, Joël Krähemann wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all
>>>
>>> Just modified the gsequencer.spec file. Now, it should be more the fedora way.
>>>
>>> https://sourceforge.net/projects/ags/files/fedora/
>>>
>>> Additionally, I uploaded the srpm and rpm packages built.
>>>
>>> * gsequencer
>>> * gsequencer-devel
>>> * gsequencer-devel-docs
>>> * gsequencer-debuginfo
>>
>> So, do you want to offer it for official package review or not?
>> It still contains a lot of packaging mistakes _not_ specific to Fedora.
>> _______________________________________________
>> devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux