Re: Two more concrete ideas for what a once-yearly+update schedule would look like

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 01:33:41PM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
> I think that ignores that we're pretty much always slipping, and they
> aren't in fact 6 month cycles. There's always pressure to get the fall
> release done on time to avoid hitting end of year holiday season, and
> we have actually busted that also which has a few times really
> imploded the following release schedule. And then next the problem is
> that QA and releng at least do not have enough of their own
> development time.

Thanks Chris — yes. I'm not at all saying that the suggestions I
put out are the best solutions, but there are definitely some things we
can improve _somehow_.

-- 
Matthew Miller
<mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Fedora Project Leader
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux