On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 10:48 AM, James Hogarth <james.hogarth@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 7 December 2016 at 09:39, Jakub Jedelsky <jakub.jedelsky@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Hi there,
>>
>> I'm maintainer of vertica-python package and want to add support for
>> python3, but I'm a little bit lost in naming.
>>
>> I named package as a upstream 'vertica-python', because (if I remember
>> correctly) naming guidelines told, that if upstream has 'python' in
>> the name it should stay there (can't found the source now). But how
>> should I name python3 package? Should it be 'python3-vertica-python'
>> od 'vertica-python3'?
>>
>> Or should I rename package to python{3,2}-vertica and obsolete
>> vertica-python?
>>
>>
>
> Well the name in setup.py is vertica-python and it installs as
> vertica_python and the pip install is that as well.
>
> So according to the guidelines I'd expect it to by
> python2-vertica-python and python3-vertica-python even if it sounds a
> little awkward, best way to handle anything that might end up
> depending on it etc
IMO this is worst thing. I think having pythonX-vertica is better.
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
-Igor Gnatenko
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
