Re: Python 2/3 package naming

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 7 December 2016 at 09:39, Jakub Jedelsky <jakub.jedelsky@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I'm maintainer of vertica-python package and want to add support for
> python3, but I'm a little bit lost in naming.
>
> I named package as a upstream 'vertica-python', because (if I remember
> correctly) naming guidelines told, that if upstream has 'python' in
> the name it should stay there (can't found the source now). But how
> should I name python3 package? Should it be 'python3-vertica-python'
> od 'vertica-python3'?
>
> Or should I rename package to python{3,2}-vertica and obsolete
> vertica-python?
>
>

Well the name in setup.py is vertica-python and it installs as
vertica_python and the pip install is that as well.

So according to the guidelines I'd expect it to by
python2-vertica-python and python3-vertica-python even if it sounds a
little awkward, best way to handle anything that might end up
depending on it etc
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux