On Tue, 2016-12-06 at 20:41 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > On 12/06/2016 08:36 PM, James Hogarth wrote: > > On 6 December 2016 at 19:24, Adam Williamson <adamwill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > So, https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1401231 seems to be > > > basically breaking everything in Rawhide at present. > > > > > > Rather than having a bug where people are trying to figure out on the > > > fly how to deal with the RPM macro change, and probably more packages > > > are getting rebuilt and broken all the time, I propose we do this: > > > > > > 1. *IMMEDIATELY* revert the change to redhat-rpm-config > > > 2. Rebuild all packages (at least noarch packages, I guess) that were > > > built since the change landed > > > > > > so we have a non-broken Rawhide. Then we could consider at our leisure > > > how to implement the change properly. > > > > > > Thoughts? > > Is it really that bad, or is it mostly fallout from a misbuilt > samba-libs package? That was totally unexpected—the package does not > even use autoconf. Yes, it's really bad. Look at the list of bugs marked as depending on it: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1393164 (owncloud) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1401172 (libldb) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1401175 (libtdb) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1401886 (gnome-shell build failed because of libtdb issue, breaking GNOME on Rawhide) Installs of virtually any Rawhide package set besides minimal are broken (because they all run through samba, libldb, or both). Many package builds cannot run because they run through samba or libldb or libtdb. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
