Re: DNF and PackageKit background data usage

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2016-10-31 at 18:57 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Huh, since F23 or so I've found the refresh button to be pretty
> reliable. It does seem to actually force Software to go refresh the
> metadata and download available updates, now. I think in the past it
> just 'forced' a run of the refresh timer, which doesn't always
> actually
> go and check for updates, it has a bunch of conditionals that decide
> whether it will. But that got changed at some point.

The problem is that if the update fails for any reason, it reports that
everything is up to date, last check for updates at the time the update
failed. It is https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=763566. Note
that bug was reported with F23, you can tell by the desktop background
in my screenshot. It's still broken today I think.

In practice, updates quite often fail for me. I think PackageKit gives
up if a mirror is missing a package, which is not an infrequent
occurrence, whereas dnf just moves on to the next mirror. (Or maybe
that got fixed?) I've seen a post-install update fail five times in a
row before. :(

Michael
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux