On Qui, 2016-10-27 at 21:23 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Fri, 2016-10-28 at 04:53 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > Adam Williamson wrote today in reply of one question (made by me) > > : > > "Hmm, actually, maybe it currently doesn't, but it definitely has > > before: > > > > http://download1.rpmfusion.org/free/fedora/updates/testing/20/x86_6 > > 4/comps.xml > > > > But basically, any repo can have comps data and dnf will respect > > it; > > you can set up an external repo with comps data that lists some > > package > > from that repo as being in the `standard` group, for instance, and > > when > > it installs the `standard` group, dnf will include that package. > > AFAIK > > this has always been intended to work. I'm not sure how often it > > gets > > tested. " > > > > Goggled and found http://rpmfusion.org/comps ;, so maybe we should > > add > > rpmfusion-comps repo (to archive) , in > > > > https://github.com/rpmfusion-infra/rpmfusion-comps/ ; > > > > > > like fedora-comps , btw comps was talked here in rpmfusion in 2007 > > [1] > > , and if we need generate comps.xml , we also may talk in Appstream > > , > > we need generate something isn't it ? And since remxis depends on > > comps.xml (If I am correct), also talk about RPMFusion remixs, not > > propose generate the remixs , but at least update remix specs [2], > > and > > be able do remix in a local machine . > > About appstream [3], can I add/update the missing packages for > > Fedora > > 23 ? and close the review request after that? > There's an RPM Fusion mailing list for discussing that project in > more > detail, I only mentioned it in passing as an example. Please discuss > plans for comps and/or appstream in Fusion on that list, not here. > Thanks! Sorry I sent to the wrong mailing list ! -- Sérgio M. B. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
