Re: RPM %changelog?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 3:09 PM, Michael Catanzaro <mcatanzaro@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sun, 2016-10-23 at 03:49 +0000, Christopher wrote:
>> 2. Should I preserve the entire changelog in the SPEC? Or should I
>> roll it
>> over when I update to the latest upstream? It seems the changelog
>> could
>> easily become the bulk of a package if everything is preserved, and
>> I'd
>> think git would suffice for anything older than the last few rebases
>> onto
>> latest upstream.
>
> This is indeed annoying. In most packages, the changelog is almost the
> entire spec file. Some packagers eventually delete old changelog
> entries, most don't. SUSE has a %changelog RPM macro that fixes this by
> moving the changelog into a .changes file stored in the same directory.
>  Every SUSE package uses it. Probably we should too?

There's also an option which trims the installed size to a max amount
(not sure what it is off hand) which is probably useful, not sure what
a changes file provides over say a git change log for the package, is
it shipped in the rpm, or is it just for reference?
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux