On Wednesday, October 5, 2016 10:49:26 AM CEST Dan Horák wrote: > I haven't thought much about it yet how feasible it would be, but why > not "abuse" rpm infrastructure even for the tests? Introduce foo-test > package as a test-suite for package foo and do everything within its > spec file - install deps (as BRs), run the tests (in %check), run in > chroot, container or natively ... And package test results/logs into > the binary foo-test rpm :-) Or leave it without %files. Right, or more - it would be fine to have testsuite `make install`able (automatically by Automake e.g.). Then anybody could create 'foo-test' package and than end-users could do the testing themselves too, transparently - the same way as taskotron would. Pavel _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
