Question 1: Final release criterion: "The release-blocking live images must properly support mounting and using a persistent storage overlay for the entire system and/or one for the /home partition." Does this requirement apply only to the image itself (i.e. mainly dracut scripts doing the environment setup for this to work)? There's an additional qualifer underneath: "does not cover the writing of the persistent overlay". Does "writing" mean "creation" of the overlay? Question 2: Beta release criterion: "Release-blocking live and dedicated installer images must boot when written to optical media of an appropriate size (if applicable) and when written to a USB stick with any of the officially supported methods. " points to your rewritten wiki page, but no where on that page does it say what is officially supported. Only Fedora Media Writer is considered recommended, the rest are considered "maybe useful". But if everything listed on the page is officially supported, that means: dd l-i-t-d Fedora Media Writer GNOME Disk Utility Unetbootin are all supported. Really? I'd say Fedora Media Writer should be the only one that's officially supported/recommended. By extension this would include dd, but it doesn't need to be explicitly stated. There are so many issues with the live overlay stuff that I think it needs a total rethink: maybe overlayfs, maybe btrfs seed device. In any case, I think this landing page should only contain the officially recommended methods, and then link to "maybe useful alternatives" on their own page. Chris Murphy _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
