Re: [Fedora-packaging] Re: Broken dependencies: vim-syntastic

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Monday, October 3, 2016 8:12:50 AM CEST Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> On Thursday, September 22, 2016 12:45:32 PM CEST Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> > Thanks a lot for this discussion.  I'll go (probably) the hacky
> > ExclusiveArch way, just because I want to give it a try.  Once this
> > becomes too tiring (because the package has non-trivial amount of
> > run-time-only dependencies), I'll talk to releng team.
> 
> The approach is here:
> http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/vim-syntastic.git/commit/?id=8f4bf0f6e30fa048bc8
> 
> One issue happened to me during the first build attempt -- aarch64 builder
> was used while aarch64 was _not_ in all _sub_packages' ExclusiveArch:
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=15918394
> 
> The second attempt on x86_64 has been successful:
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=15918430
> 
> Is this related to?
> https://pagure.io/koji/issue/19
> 
> What is the work-around?  Do I have to specify 'BuildArch: noarch' for all
> subpackages (would that help)?  Do I have to try re-building until I get the
> right machine?

Even more interesting, %arm is not on ExclusiveArch list for
'vim-syntastic-d' package, while the build on arm machine succeeded:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=15919447

What is the reason to fail on aarch64 then?

Pavel
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux