On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 06:34:36PM +0000, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > far-reaching infrastructure packages (systemd, glibc, kernel, whatever) > > that any new restrictions or constraints should be disabled by default > > in Fedora, regardless of upstream defaults, until we're able to have a > > conversation — here, in the edition WGs, and/or in FESCo, as > > appropriate for the particular change. > Every change of this type is a judgement call. Most of such changes > don't cause any issues and if FESCo wanted to review every one it > would be swamped with useless work (apart from systemd, at least > selinux introduce new restrictions every once in a while). I hope that this kind of change is not actually intended to be so frequent that "swamped" would apply! (And I agree that the same thing should apply to selinux changes which apply globally. Per-service restrictions should be coordinated with the maintainers of that particular service and raised to FESCo and WGs as appropriate.) -- Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Fedora Project Leader _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
