On Fri, 09 Sep 2016 17:54:07 -0700 Adam Williamson <adamwill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, 2016-09-07 at 10:44 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > Greetings. > > > > Fedora Infrastructure currently maintains two sites for general open > > source code hosting: fedorahosted.org and pagure.io. > > > > Fedorahosted.org was established in late 2007 using Trac for issues > > and wiki pages, Fedora Account System groups for access control and > > source uploads, and offering a variety of Source Control Management > > tools (git, svn, hg, bzr). With the rise of new workflows and source > > repositories fedorahosted.org has ceased to grow, adding just one > > new project this year and a handful the year before. > > I'm replying here as I'm not subscribed to users@. > > Pagure is fine for code projects, but we (still) use the fedora-qa > trac instance for tracking non-code-related activity, like arranging > Test Days. Is Pagure the recommended replacement for this kind of > purpose also? It doesn't feel right. If not, what is? Thanks! Yes it is. At least I am planning on moving the trac's that I control that do this sort of thing to pagure. There's been a lot of improvement to pagure's issues of late and lots of discussion of more. I think it meets the simple needs right now. More complex workflows are under discussion still, so if you need them, you might want to wait and/or join the discussion. I'm likely to move infrastructure over very soon and perhaps a bunch more of the smaller ones. kevin
Attachment:
pgpzOQmRi9dRi.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
