On Fri, Sep 09, 2016 at 11:00:21PM +0200, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > If it requires actions from releng, then it's system-wide change. But > it's not about changing existing process of building distro, it's just > bugfixing releng tools. > > So I'm not sure. > > On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 10:38 PM, Mathieu Bridon <bochecha@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Fri, 2016-09-09 at 16:49 +0200, Jan Kurik wrote: > >> = Proposed System Wide Change: DNF 2.0 = > > > > This email says it is a system-wide change. > > > >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/DNF-2.0 > > > > But this page keeps saying « not a System Wide Change ». > > > > Which is? :) Well, it could influence releng depending on the behavior of dnf-2 vs -1 and I think dnf is critical enough that making it a System Wide Change would be a good idea regardless. What is the down side of making a System-Wide Change? More people know about it? A more defined rollback procedure? Both seems like good ideas :) My 2cts, Pierre -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
