On 09/02/2016 11:52 AM, Honza Silhan wrote: > On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 5:20 PM, Tomasz Torcz <tomek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 05:04:40PM +0200, Honza Silhan wrote: >>> >>> DNF-2 release candidate will land into rawhide. It will bring many new >>> features and bug fixes. DNF-2 is using libdnf instead of hawkey or >>> libhif. Unfortunately it brings some incompatibilities with previous >>> version which were either needed to preserve compatibility with yum >>> CLI or where bigger redesigns were needed (parsing command line >>> arguments). If you own any DNF plugin or component depending on DNF, >>> please, see the DNF-1 and DNF-2 changes [3] and adjust your package >>> accordingly. Moreover bump the DNF requirement as DNF honors semantic >>> versioning [4] to prevent future breakage when another major version >>> is deployed. To majority of components requiring >>> DNF in Fedora repository were sent patches to adapt them to DNF-2. >>> >> >> Sounds like this scope would warrant a Change? > > The components should be already prepared for DNF-2 and the changes > are not huge. There's the FESCO ticket [5]. If it is not accepted then > we will submit a Change. > Actually, the preferred approach would be for this to come to FESCo *as* a Change. Mostly because the Change Process requires you to explain the situation fully and establish a contingency plan.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
