Re: riscv64 patch to filesystem.rpm

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 04:46:50PM +0200, Dan Horák wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Aug 2016 15:34:03 +0100
> "Richard W.M. Jones" <rjones@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > 
> > I wanted to push (attached) to the filesystem package in dist-git,
> > but a couple of things:
> > 
> > (1) "riscv64" isn't technically speaking an RPM architecture.  I have
> > posted patches to RPM upstream, and I think that "riscv64" is the
> > right name.
> > 
> > (2) What is the purpose of the massive list of 64 bit architectures
> > there anyway?  Wouldn't it be more sensible to use %{__isa_bits}
> > instead, as in:
> 
> wouldn't work for ia64, 64-bit, but using /usr/lib, IIRC

  We never officialy supported ia64 and it's dead now.

-- 
Tomasz Torcz                                                       72->|   80->|
xmpp: zdzichubg@xxxxxxxxx                                          72->|   80->|
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux