On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 04:46:50PM +0200, Dan Horák wrote: > On Thu, 11 Aug 2016 15:34:03 +0100 > "Richard W.M. Jones" <rjones@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > I wanted to push (attached) to the filesystem package in dist-git, > > but a couple of things: > > > > (1) "riscv64" isn't technically speaking an RPM architecture. I have > > posted patches to RPM upstream, and I think that "riscv64" is the > > right name. > > > > (2) What is the purpose of the massive list of 64 bit architectures > > there anyway? Wouldn't it be more sensible to use %{__isa_bits} > > instead, as in: > > wouldn't work for ia64, 64-bit, but using /usr/lib, IIRC We never officialy supported ia64 and it's dead now. -- Tomasz Torcz 72->| 80->| xmpp: zdzichubg@xxxxxxxxx 72->| 80->| -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx