On Thu, 11 Aug 2016 15:34:03 +0100
"Richard W.M. Jones" <rjones@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I wanted to push (attached) to the filesystem package in dist-git,
> but a couple of things:
>
> (1) "riscv64" isn't technically speaking an RPM architecture. I have
> posted patches to RPM upstream, and I think that "riscv64" is the
> right name.
>
> (2) What is the purpose of the massive list of 64 bit architectures
> there anyway? Wouldn't it be more sensible to use %{__isa_bits}
> instead, as in:
wouldn't work for ia64, 64-bit, but using /usr/lib, IIRC
Dan
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
