On Sun, Aug 07, 2016 at 09:45:57AM +0530, Parag Nemade wrote: > Hi, > > On Sat, Aug 6, 2016 at 11:07 PM, <dennis@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Sometimes a maintainer doesn't want to approve ACLs for "reasons" but > > doesn't want to reject the request for various reasons including the > > requestor re-request of denied requests. > > > > 2) Sometime back I don't remember if I filed issue against pkgdb but I > discussed on IRC why not add some text entry box while requesting > ACLs. Not everyone knows everyother one here. Let the package owner > know why the ACL requestor need other package access. That will help > package owners to decide to approve or deny quickly. There can be some > people who want to have access/co-maintainer for some packages where > they really not needed to be. There is a ticket: https://github.com/fedora-infra/pkgdb2/issues/307 > 3) I am not sure but I think there is some automation for something in > pkgdb which automatically grants package access to requstor if package > owner do not take action. Correct me if I am wrong here. Not for ACLs, this is only when someone requests a new branch for a package that you have commit on while they do not. This way, if the current maintainers do not either approve or block the request, it will automatically be sent to rel-eng that will check if it is possible to add the branch and do it if it is. Pierre -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
