>>> On the subject of RISC-V, I'm still plugging away at this. It's >>> rather slow going, but you can take a look at: >>> >>> http://git.annexia.org/?p=fedora-riscv.git;a=summary >>> >>> There is nothing much usable at the moment, and many stumbling blocks. >> >> >> Yes, but this is an "experimental arch" and is completely out of scope >> of this proposal. > > > True, but it does beg the question, how will future new arches (e.g. riscv, > or mips) be handled? Will koji-shadow still have a place in that, and what > criteria will be established for merging into primary? It would be a different set of requirements. It's more similar to how architectures achieved the former "secondary" status. These requirements basically equate to: * availability of decent enterprise hardware that can be added to the Fedora data centre for build systems and other requirements (rel-eng, QA etc) * proven commitment from a company/team/community to support the architecture * reasonable availability of hardware. It's a lot of work for the various Fedora teams to support any architecture, even as a secondary architecture. Likely a lot of other stuff that I've missed out but I think it gives a general idea. In the time between bring up phase and acceptance of the above koji-shadow still remains the proper means of ensuring builds are as close to Fedora mainline as possible. Peter -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
