On Sun, 31 Jul 2016 04:18:18 +0100 Sérgio Basto <sergio@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > why we need retire sysvinit-only packages ? Because they have had 10+ releases to adjust and haven't. > is not suppose systemd > support sysvinit and why don't you fixed the packages like you will do > for nagios ? systemd does support sysvinit scripts, but it's a good deal less optimal than a native systemd unit file for lots of reasons. nagios has a systemd unit file. It was setup/enabled in 2013, but recent spec file changes caused it to ship the old sysvinit script instead. Thats just a bug. > BTW I'd like keep 2 packages noip and tetrinetx. > Shouldn't you give some time or open bug reports before do the > retirement ? > > why such hurry ? The orig ticket ( https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/615 ) was opened 5 years ago. 9 months ago an announcement was made: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel-announce@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/thread/3XJN6JZ4S7SOG2KH2UT3GYY4K7LAJGGU/ Then another 6 months ago: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/ULPGRGI3OBFXWZISXRIX2S3Z35RBCMBN/ We could keep putting it off, but it's had a long long ramp. kevin
Attachment:
pgpR5x_nQ7_vR.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
