Re: RFC: Fixing the "nobody" user?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Oron Peled wrote:
> On יום שלישי, 19 ביולי 2016 15:23:25 IDT Matthew Miller wrote:
> > ...
> > I remember when this came up before but can't find it now. I think it
> > was changed to 99 when UIDs went to 32 bit and it suddenly started
> > being 65535 on some systems and 4294967295 on others. * I was trying to
> > figure out why 99 was eventually chosen, but can't find it now.
> 
> I believe the uid 99 come from trying not to overlap regular users.
> Back then (end of 90's), regular users uid's were:
>  * On old RedHat Linux >= 500
>  * On some other Linux systems >= 1000
>  * On many legacy Unices >= 100 (except on Irix >= 1000)
> 
> It was very common to have NFS mounted /home across all servers (with different *NIX vendors/versions).
> So '99' was the "last" uid that was assured not to collide with uid's of regular users on NFS.

Solaris and IRIX used to have 60001 as nobody, *and* either -2 or 65534
as nobody, either under the same name (!!!) or some alternative similar
to nfsnobody.  

I don't think you want to assume that code thinks the two users are 
really identical in practice or that it's safe to merge them, though. 

  -- Steve

-- 
Steven Bonneville <sbonnevi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Technical Curriculum Architect  
Red Hat | Red Hat Training                       Phone: +1-612-638-0507
gpg: 1024D/221D06FF  68B1 3E66 A351 6485 B9AF  24D8 3DF5 B50B 221D 06FF
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux