Re: Requiring package test instructions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 09:23:26PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
> nonsense - it's enough to give a sign that a potential fix don't break
> things wich worked before

Your point is valid without saying 'nonsense', so please be a bit more
civil.

I can live with a karma +1 for sanity tests if testing feedback
actually describes what they did.  "Looks good to me" may describe
anything from a full set of sanity tests to finding the update web
page visually appealing.

Siddhesh
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux