Re: F25 System Wide Change: KillUserProcesses=yes by default

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Jul 9, 2016 at 2:46 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
<zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 09, 2016 at 07:32:01AM -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 8:13 AM, Jan Kurik <jkurik@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > = Proposed System Wide Change: KillUserProcesses=yes by default =
>> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/KillUserProcesses_by_default
>> >
>> > Change owner(s):
>> > * Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx>
>> >
>> > Set the default policy to terminate processes in session scope when
>> > the user logs out. Specifically, systemd-logind's KillUserProcesses
>> > setting, which currently is set to "no" to override the upstream
>> > default, will be removed to follow the upstream default of "yes".
>>
>> We already discussed this idea on this mailing list. It's a *horrible*
>> idea. It breaks screen, nohup processes and all backgrounded tasks,
>
> Right, the next paragraph that you helpfully snipped, talks about
> changing screen to automatically register itself with systemd
> to avoid being killed. So let's discuss the change as proposed,
> with the assumption that we modify common
> run-stuff-in-the-background-on-purpose-style programs so that they
> continue to work as expected.

Well I mentioned btrfs balance and scrub, and those seem sufficiently
common for Btrfs users, who are themselves not anywhere in the
majority, that it concerns me how many programs out there are just
going to break. I remain unconvinced the scope of what will be
affected by the change is understood.



>
> [...]
>
>> For a larger environment, it still shouldn't be killing the tasks
>> automatically, That's what scheduled nightly reboots, or nightly
>> audits and autokills with user email notifications are for.
>
> That sounds like a much worse solution in every regard — because
> the issue of having to mark processes to be exempt from killing
> is still present, but the process to get rid of unwanted processes
> is asynchronous, heavyweight, nonstandard, and requires a lot of
> admin engagement. But if you have this kind of setup in place, then
> simply set KillUserProcesses=no and carry on.

I think this needs to be rethought. The  options right now are, modify
an as yet unknown quantity of background programs so they aren't
killed on user logout; vs logout/restart/shutdown likely hanging for
90 seconds. It seems the work around would be to modify screen and
tmux, and then run all such background tasks in either screen or tmux.
But, that's kinda, wow... bit of a hammer.


-- 
Chris Murphy
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux