Re: Is bodhi's stable request policy confused?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 2 Jul 2016 07:14:54 -0700
Andrew Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> The web UI would not let me push my update to stable despite having
> plenty of karma
> (https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/fish-2.3.0-2.fc24).  The
> options were "Edit" and "Unpush".
> 
> I was able to request stable from the command line, though:
> 
> $ bodhi -u amluto -R stable fish-2.3.0-2.fc24
> No handlers could be found for logger "fedora.client.bodhi"
> Traceback (most recent call last):
>   File "/usr/bin/bodhi", line 537, in <module>
>     main()
>   File "/usr/bin/bodhi", line 273, in main
>     log.info(data['tg_flash'])
> KeyError: 'tg_flash'
> 
> The output notwithstanding, that worked.
> 
> Are there known bugs here?  Should I file bugs against both bodhi the
> package and bodhi the web application?

I would suggest filing an issue here:
https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/issues

Explaining things and then if there's changes needed in several places
dependent bugs can be added then. 

kevin

Attachment: pgp5PRW0Hqelw.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux