Re: Fedora development of Snap packages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 17 Jun 2016 15:05:01 -0400, you wrote:

>I still think we, as a distribution, should not be in the business of
>discouraging downstream packaging in favor of *upstream* provided flatpaks,
>though (which was my original objection to the idea).

Which is better for the user:

1) upstream Flatpak that the user can get support from upstream if
they run into problems

2) Fedora package (either rpm or Flatpak) that upstream won't support,
so if the user runs into problems they are told to talk to Fedora,
which while I certainly appreciate the effort done by packagers they
often aren't familiar with the codebases and can't offer any help?
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux