On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 04:45:25PM -0400, Ben Rosser wrote: > > I was thinking remove the Fedora package. What's the point in > > maintaining a secret Fedora package for a graphical app, when we're > > going to be presenting a different version of that app to users? > > > Well, if a packager wants to maintain it, why not? > > As someone who's a bit skeptical about containers as the future of software > distribution, I'd like to continue getting "traditionally packaged" > applications from Fedora where possible. I became a Fedora packager as a > large part because I wanted to expand the pool of such software that was > available in Fedora, by making it available to other users. It seems like > that's not a thing we're going to care about as much going forward, which I > guess is... fine, but I kind of have mixed feelings about the whole thing. > > I suspect I am in a minority here, though. I hope you aren't, I share your sentiments exactly. -- Tomasz Torcz ,,(...) today's high-end is tomorrow's embedded processor.'' xmpp: zdzichubg@xxxxxxxxx -- Mitchell Blank on LKML -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
