Re: DNF Issue, packages being incorrectly removed - was: Re: corebird

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 27 May 2016 19:25, "Gerald B. Cox" <gbcox@xxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 11:15 AM, James Hogarth <james.hogarth@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> On the bug you said a dnf reinstall ... that's not the best thing to do... you need to dnf mark installed as per the earlier comments on the bug
>
>
> Wouldn't the reinstall accomplish that?  I agree, the solution in the release notes is concise, easy and quick - and the impact of having some extra
> packages on a system isn't that big of deal (at least not to me) - but if you reinstall, the package would be marked as user installed wouldn't it?
>

I'm not entirely certain of the answer to that, though it should be quick to test when I get to a machine later.

But in terms of efficiencies reinstall does a full reinstall of the package, including download and and scripts. Doing mark installed just tells dnf what the world is meant to look like.

--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux