I think Josh wrote nice blog about "kernel release cycle": http://jwboyer.livejournal.com/51935.html Based on it, I'd be surprised to see 4.6 land in F24 prior stable release. Vít Dne 18.5.2016 v 17:27 Matthew Miller napsal(a): > On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 05:44:43PM +0000, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote: >> There is more extensive testing performed before GA release then >> there is in the update process hence what get's shipped in the GA >> release has better testing coverage regardless of people believes in >> Red Hat's kernel team hence it's better to ship the 4.6 in the final >> then to deliver it as an 0 day update. > I have faith in the kernel and QA teams' regular testing and updates > process. But there's another key difference you're leaving out: if a > kernl problem arises at the last minute which affects the install > media (anaconda or otherwise), that may involve significant work and > delay. If a problem is discovered with a kernel in updates-testing, > it's just the kernel. > -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
