On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 10:22 PM, Paul Wouters <paul@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, 3 May 2016, opensource@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > >> libsilc orphan, cicku, nosnilmot 9 weeks ago > > >> Depending on: libsilc (12), status change: 2016-02-26 (9 weeks ago) >> pidgin (maintained by: jsynacek, itamarjp, jskarvad, mcrha, >> nosnilmot) >> libpurple-2.10.12-2.fc24.i686 requires libsilc-1.1.so.2, >> libsilcclient-1.1.so.3 >> pidgin-2.10.12-2.fc24.src requires libsilc-devel = >> 1.1.10-15.fc24 > > > [ list of pidgin plugins including the one I maintain ] > > I got a few of these warnings in the last few weeks and I'd like those > to stop :) > > Is there any interest in supporting SILC? It's an old encryption chat > protcol that I never used or never heard of someone using. > > Do the pidgin maintainers want to take the package on, or recompile > pidgin without silc support so we can get pidgin of the death list? I've disabled silc support. -- Jan Synacek Software Engineer, Red Hat -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
