On Tue, 3 May 2016, opensource@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
libsilc orphan, cicku, nosnilmot 9 weeks ago
Depending on: libsilc (12), status change: 2016-02-26 (9 weeks ago) pidgin (maintained by: jsynacek, itamarjp, jskarvad, mcrha, nosnilmot) libpurple-2.10.12-2.fc24.i686 requires libsilc-1.1.so.2, libsilcclient-1.1.so.3 pidgin-2.10.12-2.fc24.src requires libsilc-devel = 1.1.10-15.fc24
[ list of pidgin plugins including the one I maintain ] I got a few of these warnings in the last few weeks and I'd like those to stop :) Is there any interest in supporting SILC? It's an old encryption chat protcol that I never used or never heard of someone using. Do the pidgin maintainers want to take the package on, or recompile pidgin without silc support so we can get pidgin of the death list? Paul -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
