On 05/04/2016 08:39 PM, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 6:09 PM, Tom Callaway <tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On 05/04/2016 04:18 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote: >>> What about things like openmw that in theory can be run with free >>> assests, but for which there really isn't anything beyond a demo for >>> other than the assests from a proprietary game? >> >> The assets should not be a problem unless they're tied directly into >> openmw as a runtime dependency (see Stephen's earlier example of the >> PlayStation emulators that require a firmware blob). >> > > So PCSX-R (which supplies its own replacement for the PS1 BIOS) would > be permissible, while PCSX2 (which requires a Sony BIOS) would not, > right? As long as the PS1 BIOS replacement is FOSS and built from source, yes. ~tom == Red Hat -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
