On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 1:54 PM, Josh Boyer <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 7:38 AM, Denise Dumas <ddumas@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Sounds like a job for rhscl :-) > > Maybe? > > Having nodejs in an SCL (or eventually module) would certainly help > with versioning issues going forward. However, given Fedora has Versioning maybe but not the "we're going to be shipping a major version of nodejs that will be EOL half way through the F-24 cycle" problem. Whether it's SCL format or standard package format it would still be built against F-24 deps and we'd still have the issue here. Sure there could be 4.x and 6.x along side each other but we'd still have a EOL potentially vuln release hanging around. Peter -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
