On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 8:54 AM, Josh Boyer <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 7:38 AM, Denise Dumas <ddumas@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Sounds like a job for rhscl :-) > > Maybe? > > Having nodejs in an SCL (or eventually module) would certainly help > with versioning issues going forward. However, given Fedora has > nodejs in the base repository today, Stephen is still left with a hard > choice here. If his repoquery magic is correct then I think reverting > to 4.x at the base level for F24 is likely the right idea. > > I do like the idea of having 5.x and 6.x in an SCL or module or COPR > (all somewhat variations on a theme) though. > Would it be possible to try a nodejs 6.x build of everything in a side-tag or something? My understanding (based on the changelog) is that things should generally work, as while the ABI broke, most of the API remained the same. Personally, I'm not a fan of the idea of using SCLs to support newer environments in Fedora. I'd prefer if SCLs were used to support older ones, with newer ones being the default. -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
