On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 1:36 AM, Dennis Gilmore <dennis@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Monday, April 18, 2016 5:30:49 PM CDT Matthew Miller wrote: >> On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 01:47:49PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: >> > > Is it acceptable to have Beta & Final release dates for F24 as stated >> > > on [1], or we really need to slip these dates ? >> > >> > From QA's side we can at least try to make the unamended date, as I >> > said. >> >> Awesome. I'd really, really not like to slip F25 further, even if F24 >> does end up with an adjustment. That's because that's targetted at Nov >> 8 (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/25/Schedule) already, and >> that gives us one week of slip before we're in Thanksgiving week, and >> if that happens, we're probably not really releasing the week after >> either, leaving with another December release (and people worrying that >> the F26 schedule can't possibly target May). > > I think we have all of the releng changes lined up for Beta, though another > week would let us get layered image build service in production. I do not > think that pushing 24 out an extra week needs to delay f25 in any way shape or > form. Mostly I was worried we had not followed policy and we have perhaps > not left enough time for developers to get their Beta fixes in. Thanks Dennis for your readiness as well as for opening this topic. I will take this as a lesson learnt and will communicate such deviation from policy in a better way if there will be a need to do such things in the future. Regards, Jan > Dennis -- Jan Kuřík Platform & Fedora Program Manager Red Hat Czech s.r.o., Purkynova 99/71, 612 45 Brno, Czech Republic -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
