On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 10:30 PM, Adam Williamson <adamwill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, 2016-04-18 at 15:11 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote: >> Hi Jan, >> >> Looking at the schedule[1] today I am confused by one thing, Fedora policy >> states that any slip pushes out all other milestones. which would mean Beta >> Freeze is next week not this week. >> >> Dennis >> >> >> [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/24/Schedule > > Er. Yes. That's a point. > > I tend to just take it on faith that the schedules get adjusted after > slips, but AFAICS, the F24 schedule was not adjusted after the Alpha > slip. > https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Releases/24/Schedule&diff=439901&oldid=435873 > is when the wiki schedule was adjusted for the Alpha slip, but the only > date that was changed was the Alpha release date, no other dates were > touched. > > As things stand it's possible we could make the non-adjusted Beta > dates, though there's some missing test coverage we'd really need to > get to, but it's definitely not what we've done before without an > explicit decision to *not* change the later dates. I have only changed the Alpha release date and intentionally have left the Beta and Final the same. This has been communicated to Marketing, unfortunately (my fault) not to rel-eng nor QA. The reason was mainly not to affect F25. Is it acceptable to have Beta & Final release dates for F24 as stated on [1], or we really need to slip these dates ? [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/24/Schedule Regards, Jan > -- > Adam Williamson > Fedora QA Community Monkey > IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net > http://www.happyassassin.net -- Jan Kuřík Platform & Fedora Program Manager Red Hat Czech s.r.o., Purkynova 99/71, 612 45 Brno, Czech Republic -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
