Re: iproute package split

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 7 Apr 2016 16:07, "Phil Sutter" <psutter@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 12:55:40PM +0000, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > If you have:
> >

<snip>

> > Maybe you already thought about this, but I'd add
> > Recommends: iproute-tc to the main package, and
>
> I guess that's merely a hint, right?
>

At this time dnf installs recommended packages listed at the same time, but having it excluded will not fail the install.

> > Requires: iproute-tc = %{version}-%{release} to tc subpackage.
>
> Why should iproute-tc require itself? Could you please explain the
> effect this has?

I assume he meant have iproute-tc require the mass matching iproute version to ensure they are kept in sync when both are installed.

--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux